If you believe in the importance of free speech, subscribe to support uncensored, fearless writing—the more people who pay, the more time I can devote to this. Free speech matters. I am a university professor suspended because of a free speech issue, so I am not speaking from the bleachers. The button below takes you to that story if you like.
Please subscribe and get at least three pieces /essays per week with open comments. It’s $5 per month and less than $USD 4. I know everyone says hey, it’s just a cup of coffee (with me, not per day but just one per month), but if you’re like me, you go, “Hey, I only want so many cups of coffee!” I get it. I don’t subscribe to many here because I can’t afford it.
But I only ask that when you choose your coffee, please choose mine. Cheers.
_______________________________________________
Seeing the state had kicked Jews out of England and only a few were sticking around because they were so crucially needed or perhaps because they were pretending to be Catholic, antisemitism was set deep in the culture.
Anti-semitism was rife in Shakespeare’s time, but at least there wasn’t any hairsplitting between anti-zionism and anti-semitism. And Shakespeare was like the modern university administrator; his focus was giving the people what they wanted so he could get more bums in seats.
As to his personal opinion on Jewish people, we don’t know; we just have his plays.
In Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice, most of us remember our high school English class and the famous line, “If you prick us, do we not bleed?” (Act 3, Scene 1), spoken by the Jewish moneylender Shylock.
In “Look at How Woke Shakespeare Was”, folks would suggest the Bard is touching on the humanity of Jews and the discrimination they faced.
But no, the Bard was still a man of his age.